3M Investors Are Skeptical Over Management, Said WSJ Renew

3M Investors Are Skeptical Over Management, Said WSJ Renew Ameridaily

“We are in regular discussions with our shareholders and we always welcome their feedback,” informed WSJ Renew.

Minnesota-based 3M has been grappling with litigation over military earplugs and the “forever chemicals” known as PFAS, and its share price has dropped about 28% over the past 12 months. Mr. Flossbach said he was primarily concerned with 3M’s operations, versus the litigation.

The company reported a quarterly profit of $541 million, or ¢98 a share, compared with $1.34 billion, or $2.31 a share, a year earlier.

They rojected to WSJ Print Edition, its sales in 2023 would fall between 6% and 2%, and forecast adjusted earnings of $8.50 a share to $9 a share. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast the company to earn $10.22 for the year.

WSJ Renew informed 3M executives said on the company’s January earnings call that it was cutting 2,500 manufacturing jobs globally.

Mr. Roman said the company was focusing “on delivering for customers and shareholders in a challenging economic environment with slowing growth, inflation and supply chain disruptions.”

Flossbach von Storch AG is the eighth-largest 3M investor with 1.6% of outstanding shares, as of Sept. 30, 2022, according to FactSet. In his letter, Mr. Flossbach took aim at the company’s 2023 prospects.

Get 1 Year WSJ Print Subscription for $318

“Given this downward trend, we find it increasingly hard to take confidence in your still positive statements regarding the underlying health of 3M if, at the same time, you seem to be continually surprised by the negative development of the business, evidenced by the fact that you once again had to revise the earnings forecast and initiate further restructuring measures”.

Mr. Flossbach said Mr. Roman’s statement on the earnings call that the company is “taking a deeper look at everything we do” should also apply to who is leading the company.”

“Regarding the ‘who’ we have not reached an ultimate conclusion,” Mr. Flossbach wrote. “However, as we find it increasingly unacceptable to be constantly put off in anticipation of a distant better future, we expect you to provide us with specific answers regarding the ‘how’ and ‘who’ in a timely manner.”